- The Black Eyed Peas are clearly trying to wrest the “Most Annoying and Omnipresent Wedding Song” trophy away from Marcia Griffiths.
“X-Men: First Class”
Whose bright idea was it to cast January Jones in this? Oh, sure, I get it. The 1960s prequel idea is easier to sell because of the popularity of “Mad Men.” Jones went from also-ran status (I remember her from “American Wedding”) to star because of her role as Betty in “Mad Men.” There is a problem: Jones is so wooden as Emma Frost that I was checking the screen for splinters. Frost, as recently rewritten by Grant Morrison and Joss Whedon, is a smart, funny, and — sigh, I’ll say it — bitchy character. Jones is bland, bland, and more bland. She fills out a white Playboy getup nicely, but I doubt she’s the only actress who can pull this off.
But hey, the first three “X-Men” had Halle Berry as Storm, and she was dreadful,* so one lame performance does not drag this movie down. It’s actually pretty fantastic, precisely because it can’t lean on popular characters. The closing action sequence is the best of any of these films,** and yes, that’s partly because Matthew Vaughn doesn’t have the crutch of tossing Wolverine at things. Flying looks cool. Teleportation looks cool. Tossing missiles with the power of magnetic field manipulation looks cool. All of these actions are deployed. Caleb Jones, who plays Banshee, is a real delight — the sonic scream plays much better on film than it ever did in the funny papers.
Since I mentioned Jones, let me salute Vaughn et al for figuring out what the producers of “The Practice” once figured out — when in doubt, replace your cast with a bunch of unknowns and has-beens. Kevin Bacon is rescued from whatever the hell he’s doing to play a perfectly creepy (forcing Frost to get him ice from an iceberg!) Sebastian Shaw, whose kinetic energy absorbing power looks damn cool. The whole young cast is fantastic; Beast and Mystique have a genuinely sweet meet-cute romance that erases some of the weirdness of the Mystique-Xavier relationship.
So, see it. And read on if you want more nitpicking.
- It’s really quite odd that this and the horrendous “Wolverine” end the same way — with the hero catching a bullet that sets up the physical flaw that will define his character.
- Why does every X-movie have a silent hitman character on the villain team? In “X-Men,” it’s Sabretooth, who just looks menacing. In “X-Men: The Last Stand,” it’s the transexual fishnet-wearing guy thing. In this, it’s the wind power guy who looks like Taboo from the Black Eyed Peas.***
- At first I rolled my eyes at the killing of the one black character, but the more I thought about it, the more I enjoyed the cliche. After all, Darwin is introduced in a montage of far better known characters. Banshee! Havok! Guy You’ve Never Heard Of! Also, apparently there’s a post-credit sequence in which Darwin resurrects himself, but I didn’t see it.
- In “The Last Stand,” a non-crippled Xavier scouts Jean Grey. In “Wolverine,” a young blonde mutant basically has Frost’s diamond power. I assume this movie has retconned both of those movies. Hooray!
*Speaking of Whedon, he is responsible for Berry’s infamous line “Do you know what happens to a toad when it’s struck by lightning? IT EXPLODES.” But the leaden delivery is all Berry.
**You remember how the first and the second both involve huge, stupid MacGuffins that shoot lots of special effects? That sucked.
***Oh, it’s Riptide. Whatever.
Vacation
I am spending a week in the Outer Banks of North Carolina. It’s my third season here, the third since I followed a group of friends down here and realized that lounging in a house that walks out onto an Atlantic Ocean beach is a good way to reconfigure your brain and read the books you’ve been meaning to read.
The Imperfectionists — Fantastic novel that’s more than its component vignettes. Extremely poignant for journalists.
Doctor Strange: The Oath — Brian K. Vaughn’s fun take on the character, which doubles as an origin story.
Chew (vols 1-3) — Surreal!
Tumblr
The chief thing I’ve learned from the popularity of Tumblr blogs is that people are pretty much insane. So many animated gifs! I thought we took care of that in 2004!
Where I’m Blogging From
For the third time in six years I’ve appeared in a New York Times piece about myself or people like me. Why does the Grey Lady keep doing this? Am I that interesting? As I sit at home drinking a Coke Zero and idly watching “Wild Man Blues,” the 1997 documentary about Woody Allen’s lackadaisical jazz tour, I have to say “no.”
I say that, partly, because I know why I’m increasingly lumped in with the liberal blogger set — we’re all friends, I left the Washington Post over stuff I’d said on an e-mail list Ezra Klein ran — but I’m not sure it’s write. You want an onanistic rundown of my career, to judge whether I’m some lucky blogger or not? Okay.
2000: I graduate from the American Community School in Cobham, UK, and head to Northwestern University. At ACS I’d been the overly ambitious editor of the reviews section of the school newspaper, the Heywood. At Northwestern I ambitiously try out to be a reporter for the Daily. I’m not that great at it, partly because I’m more interested in politics than makes sense for a student newspaper. At a rally for Ralph Nader’s presidential campaign I interview Michael Moore; the Daily thinks the pre-”Bowling for Columbine” Moore is uninteresting. So I take the story over to the weekly conservative paper, the Northwestern Chronicle.
2001: I work my way up at the Chronicle, which is fairly easy, because it’s small. We spend an inordinate amount of time worrying about papers getting thrown out too early by janitors. Over the summer, I intern at the conservative law firm the Center for Individual Rights, helping develop their website and write their reports. I get to write some real stories with the attacks of 9/11 and the outbreak of the war on terror — Bernardine Dohrn, the wife of Bill Ayers, is a professor at the college, and as he tours “Radical Days,” this is a scandal and a problem. I also launch a personal blog at davidweigel.com.
2002: I become editor of the “Chron,” then get my first journalism internship — the sole intern at Campaigns and Elections, when it’s still owned by Congressional Quarterly. I get it in part by freelancing for them to impress a J-School teacher.
2003: In the spring I intern at Money magazine, and write a few short stories but discover that I really, really have no knack for financial reporting — at least not at age 21. (I am aware that Andrew Ross Sorkin was probably redefining the craft at that age.) But I fumble and fail to get a good internship for the summer. My best shot, at Reason magazine — where I’ve been trying to submit stories — is aborted when I lose the internship to someone named “Kerry Howley.” The magazine’s editors assure me it was a close call and let me write a few articles over the summer, but it’s my last lazy summer, a fertile time for reading and less fertile time for reporting.
2004: I accept a job at Liberty magazine in Washington state, but right after I do, I learn that I’ve won a yearlong internship at USA Today, sponsored by the Collegiate Network, the conservative organization that helps fund the Chron. I’m iffy on the idea of heading to DC so quickly instead of making my name somewhere else, but it’s too good not to take; I move there in April. In the summer, during the political conventions, I edit a roundup of bloggers’ takes from New York and Boston — one of the people I spotlight is someone named “Ezra Klein.” I live in Arlington, but come into D.C. when I can to meet other reporters and people with blogs at events hosted by the America’s Future Foundation or by people like Julian Sanchez of Reason.
2005: The USA Today internship ends in September, a bit late, and because I’d gotten more time there — also, because I’m a bit nervous about what to do next — I don’t line up a full-time job. (The most interesting possibility, a gig covering arms control policy for a National Journal publication, doesn’t get past the interview stage.) It’s back to freelancing. I move from a one-bedroom in Arlington to a much cheaper apartment in Fairfax, Virginia, with fellow writers Jim Antle and Jeremy Lott.
2006: In March I’m hired by Reason, full-time. This is when my “professional blogger” career actually sort of starts — I become one of the busiest contributors to Hit & Run, in addition to writing several articles a month and (I am terrible at this) helping edit the magazine. In the summer I do some guest-blogging for Wonkette, and Gawker Media talks to me about working there, but I pass, saying I like Reason and don’t have enough experience. In August, Julian Sanchez announces that a room has opened up in his house. Tired of hour-long commutes to get to the Hill — and this doesn’t count the long dark walk from my house to the metro stop at the end of the orange line — I move in.
2007: At Reason I get the break of my career — the Ron Paul presidential campaign. I get to travel the country writing stories about Paul and the GOP candidates. Andrew Sullivan does me a great favor, letting me guest-blog for him. Back in D.C., I build a good group of friends, mostly because we know each other online and around the neighborhood.
2008: In November, the campaign wraps up I leave Reason. I get a part-time gig blogging for the Economist, before my friends Spencer and Laura suggest I apply to their magazine, the Washington Independent, to cover conservative politics.
2009: I start at the WIndy, as we call it; I travel to Kentucky to cover a gun show, to St. Louis to hit up a conservative conference, and basically concentrate more on news reporting than I have before, trying to break more stories. It’s a lot of fun.
2010: In March, the Washington Post hires me to take my conservative beat from TWI and do it for them, in the politics section. And from this point I guess people know what I’ve been up to.
So, that’s the bio, with as little art and color as I can muster. If anyone wants to rant about the kids these days and how they haven’t paid their dues, I’m sympathetic — I really should have worked harder from 2001 to 2003 to get more local reporting experience. But there’s a lot of hard work behind me, a lot of failures and a few more successes.
Screw You, Rolling Stone Readers
The 10 Best Albums of the 80s For Real Now
Captain Beefheart, Doc at the Radar Station
Ramones, End of the Century
The Soft Boys, Underwater Moonlight
The Beastie Boys, Paul’s Boutique
Prince, Purple Rain
XTC, Skylarking
The Go-Betweens, 16 Lovers Lane
Steve Earle, Guitar Town
Marillion, Misplaced Childhood
Kate Bush, Hounds of Love
Oscars 2011: Predictions, Opinions
Perusing the nominated films this year, I find that I have seen all the Best Picture nominees, all but one of the Best Actor/Actress performances (Biutiful), all but one of the Best Supporting Actor/Actress nominees (Animal Kingdom), and all but two of the documentaries. So here are my predictions for the winners, my haughty judgments of who SHOULD win, and my even-haughtier judgments of what else should have been nominated.
BEST PICTURE
Will win: The King’s Speech. Sure. Why not? It’s a terrific movie, apart from the problems Christopher Hitchens has laid out clearly and at length. It’s fun because, as some critic (whose name escapes me) pointed out, it’s basically a sports movie. Which brings me to:
Should win: The Fighter. My standard for greatness is “Do I want to watch this again?” I want to re-watch only a couple of these movies, but I really, really want to re-watch this. I loved the portrayal of Lowell’s white trash, the occasional gawkers looking at their verbal spats, the visceral boxing scenes, and all the acting — all of it, especially the characters who aren’t getting much buzz.
Should have been nominated: Four Lions. Chris Morris’s wonderful farce about terrorism deserved more attention than it got. Instead of: “The Kids Are Alright.”
BEST ACTOR
Will win: Colin Firth. I’m fine with that.
Should win: Colin Firth. You see?
Should have been nominated: Michael Shannon from “My Son, My Son, What Have Ye Done?” As I keep saying, he’s either a great actor or a crazy person who keeps breaking onto movie sets. Instead of: Jeff Bridges in “True Grit.”
BEST ACTRESS:
Will win: Natalie Portman. It’s the choice between gold-plating the box office star (Portman) and rewarding the older actress who keeps getting passed over (Bening) and I’d bet on the gold-plating. I can’t be the only person liking “The Kids Are Alright” less in retrospect.
Should win: Nicole Kidman. I don’t even like Kidman that much, but “Rabbit Hole” was the best I’ve ever seen her — more emotionally devastating than Portman because there are no pyrotechnics to help her out.
Should have been nominated: Hallie Stanfield should have been in this category, but she wasn’t, because of the horse race. Instead of: Michelle Williams.
Oscar-Nominated Shorts
Landmark Theatres has the distribution rights for the short films — animated, live action, documentary — nominated for Oscars. These films are typically revelatory in their lameness. You watch them. You ask: “Is THAT all you need to produce a film that, if rewarded, can have you called an ‘Oscar winner’?”
The answer is yes.
Two of the films nominated in this category are mediocre. They are “The Warriors of Quijong,” which reports on a small Chinese town’s fight against polluters, and “Strangers No More,” about a school for refugee children in Israel.
The Oscar Nominated Shorts
Landmark Theatres has the distribution rights for the short films — animated, live action, documentary — nominated for Oscars. These films are typically revelatory in their lameness. You watch them. You ask: “Is THAT all you need to produce a film that, if rewarded, can have you called an ‘Oscar winner’?”
The answer is yes.
Two of the films nominated in this category are mediocre. They are “The Warriors of Quijong,” which reports on a small Chinese town’s fight against polluters, and “Strangers No More,” about a school for refugee children in Israel.
Books I Read: O
The review is here. It’s not a very good novel!
http://www.bookforum.com/review/7089
And so I initiate a companion to my micro-reviews of movies I see all year: Micro-reviews of books.